This is a concept website · Enquire about this domain

aiconsultancy.com.auAdopting AI, practice by practice

Entry 00 · The register

AI consultancy: adopting AI by Australia’s own guidance

Before an AI tool does any work in a business, Australia’s national guidance asks a prior question: who will answer for it? Deciding who is accountable is the first of its six essential practices, and the guidance places the final responsibility for where and how AI is used on the organisation itself.

This site is a guide to that governance side of adopting AI, published by Dotto. It sets out the national guidance, and the rules around it, from the official sources listed at the foot of each page.

Guidance
Guidance for AI Adoption, published on 21 October 2025
Standing
The Australian Government’s guidance for responsible AI use, beside the laws that already apply
Announced
Mandatory Australian Standards for AI, 15 July 2026

General information, not legal advice. The official place to check is the National AI Centre’s essential AI practices on ai.gov.au, read for this page on 9 October 2026.

The register

Six practices, starting with who answers

The guidance asks an organisation to work through all six practices, beginning with the first steps in each and adding the later ones as its use of AI grows. In its foundations version, the very first step is to make a senior leader the overall owner of AI governance.

  1. Decide who is accountable

    Give AI governance an overall owner, give every AI system its own accountable person, and write an AI policy for staff.

  2. Understand impacts and plan accordingly

    Work out who a system could affect, and give those people a way to report problems and challenge its decisions.

  3. Measure and manage risks

    Screen each use, and flag any that carries unacceptable risk or needs closer governance.

  4. Share essential information

    Keep a register of every AI system and how it is used, and make telling people about AI use the normal practice.

  5. Test and monitor

    Test a system before it goes live, keep watching it afterwards, and ask a supplier to show proof of testing.

  6. Maintain human control

    Keep a person overseeing each system, able to pause it, override it, roll it back or shut it down.

Each practice, with every first step the guidance gives, is set out in the six essential practices, step by step.

Five entries

The five guides

Beside the guidance

The laws a business already answers to

The National AI Centre is plain that AI does not sit outside ordinary law. In a briefing for directors and managers, it says the laws that already govern how a business operates apply to its AI systems as well, naming privacy, anti-discrimination, workplace and intellectual property law among them, and warning that misleading statements in AI-driven advertising could breach consumer law.

For company directors, the same briefing points to section 180 of the Corporations Act 2001, and says the duty of care and diligence there includes making sure adequate governance systems exist to manage the risks an AI system creates. Section 180(1) reads:

“A director or other officer of a corporation must exercise their powers and discharge their duties with the degree of care and diligence that a reasonable person would exercise if they: (a) were a director or officer of a corporation in the corporation’s circumstances; and (b) occupied the office held by, and had the same responsibilities within the corporation as, the director or officer.”

Corporations Act 2001, s 180(1), compilation of 19 September 2026. The business judgment rule in s 180(2) is printed in full in the licensees guide.

The briefing also says that anyone unsure of their legal obligations around AI should get legal advice, and that even a good lawyer can help only if someone in the business can explain what the system is for, the data it relies on and how it works in practice.

Dated 15 July 2026

Mandatory standards, announced

On 15 July 2026 the Prime Minister announced that the Government will establish “a set of Australian Standards for AI”. He said they would bring the expectations for large AI data centres announced in March “into one regulatory framework”, “Clear, consistent and mandatory”, and that the Government would aim to bring the legislation to Parliament early next year: early 2027.

Among the matters the standards will set rules for, the speech named large data centres: their location, and their use of power and water. It did not set out what the standards would ask of a business that uses AI, or how they would sit beside the Guidance for AI Adoption.

For now, the six practices are what the National AI Centre offers as a shared baseline for responsible AI use, and they sit on top of laws that already apply in full.